ATLANTIC  |  ideas

The Supreme Court Isn’t a Rubber Stamp

最高法院不是一个橡皮图章

The Supreme Court Isn’t a Rubber Stamp
2026-02-20  1142  困难
字体大小

The Court ruled that Congress had not really inadvertently turned over its tariff authority to the president when it passed IEEPA. The opinion itself is fractured and awkward. Three conservative justices—John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, and Neil Gorsuch—joined with the three liberal justices to strike down Trump’s IEEPA tariffs on narrow textual grounds. “Based on two words separated by 16 others in Section 1702(a)(1)(B) of IEEPA—‘regulate’ and ‘importation’—the President asserts the independent power to impose tariffs on imports from any country, of any product, at any rate, for any amount of time. Those words cannot bear such weight,” the controlling opinion, written by Roberts, declares.

请登录后继续阅读完整文章

还没有账号?立即注册

成为会员后您将享受无限制的阅读体验,并可使用更多功能,了解更多


免责声明:本文来自网络公开资料,仅供学习交流,其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。