Against ‘chat control’: we can’t eliminate child abuse by eliminating privacy

反对“聊天控制”:我们不能通过消除隐私来消除儿童虐待

‘Keeping children safe online is ultimately a parental responsibility, not a pretext for Big Brother surveillance.’

‘Keeping children safe online is ultimately a parental responsibility, not a pretext for Big Brother surveillance.’

2025-10-13  744  中等
字体大小

In the UK, Apple faced legal action earlier this year after refusing to build a secret government backdoor into its devices, while the secure chat app Signal has indicated it would rather exit from the UK than comply with the government’s demand to weaken encryption. Globally, laws like the UK’s Online Safety Act, Australia’s under-16 social media ban, and an increasing number of US state laws are mandating age verification not just for porn sites, but also for platforms like Reddit and Discord. The result is the over-censorship of legal content as “harmful to minors”, or platforms like Bluesky shutting off service altogether in certain states.

请登录后继续阅读完整文章

还没有账号?立即注册

成为会员后您将享受无限制的阅读体验,并可使用更多功能,了解更多


免责声明:本文来自网络公开资料,仅供学习交流,其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。